Friday, March 30, 2007

Dog Shit Taco

Further to a few earlier posts, where I question whether the Palestinian Arabs have the capacity for anything other than bloodshed (and where I ask the question "why aren't they using the money they spend on terror to build their society?"), we have the now-infamous "Shit Tsunami" in Gaza last week that killed five Palestinian Arabs.

Look, I am not going to lie-I don't shed a tear when I hear of a dead Palestinian Arab. I'm happy to see Hamas and Fatah duel it out and I'm none too sad to see them drown in their own shit. In fact, I think it's fitting.

Of course, the media are trying to spin this story to blame Israel. Here's one quote:
"The overflowing of the basin is one of the results of the suspension of international aid to our people, which is preventing the government from improving and developing infrastructure," Hamas said in a statement.


And here's another

Efforts to build a new waste treatment plant were repeatedly hampered by fighting between Israel and the Palestinians. Stuart Shepard, of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, said that since the report was published, international funding for a new plant had been secured but construction could not go ahead because the area was too dangerous.

Umm Naser is about 300 yards from the border with Israel in an area where Palestinians have frequently launched rockets into Israel, and Israeli artillery and aircraft have fired back.


Two points: First, if the Palestinian Arabs would stop firing rockets into Israel, Israel would not have to fire back. Second, if the Palestinian Arabs would spend their time and money building infrastructure instead of rockets and suicide bomb vests, they'd have decent sewage treatment facilities.

Cause and effect, retards. You wage a terrorist war, you can't afford to build the society that your people want. Oh, and if you fire rockets from a certain area, don't blame the people you target for making that area unsafe.

Until the Palestinian Arabs can conduct themselves as civilized people who truly want to live in peace, well, let them drown in shit.

Sunday, March 25, 2007

A story the NY Times will ignore

Sunni sheiks join fight vs. insurgency
By TODD PITMAN, Associated Press Writer
Sun Mar 25, 3:39 PM ET

Not long ago it would have been unthinkable: a Sunni sheik allying himself publicly with American forces in a xenophobic city at the epicenter of Iraq's Sunni insurgency.

Today, there is no mistaking whose side Sheik Abdul Sattar al-Rishawi is on. Outside his walled home, a U.S. tank is on permanent guard beside a clutch of towering date palms and a protective dirt berm.

The 36-year-old sheik is leading a growing movement of Sunni tribesmen who have turned against al-Qaida-linked insurgents in Anbar province. The dramatic shift in alliances may have done more in a few months to ease daily street battles and undercut the insurgency here than American forces have achieved in years with arms.

The American commander responsible for Ramadi, Col. John W. Charlton, said the newly friendly sheiks, combined with an aggressive counterinsurgency strategy and the presence of thousands of new Sunni police on the streets, have helped cut attacks in the city by half in recent months.

In November 2005, American commanders held a breakthrough meeting with top Sunni chiefs in Ramadi, hoping to lure them away from the insurgents' fold. The sheiks responded positively, promising cooperation and men for a police force that was then virtually nonexistent.

But in January 2006 a suicide bomber attacked a police recruiting drive, killing 70 people. Insurgents killed at least four sheiks for cooperating with the Americans, and many others fled.

The killings left the effort in limbo, until a turning point; insurgents killed a prominent sheik last year and refused to let family members bury the body for four days, enraging Sunni tribesmen, said U.S. Lt. Col. Miciotto Johnson, who heads the 1st Battalion, 77th Armored Regiment and visits al-Rishawi frequently in western Ramadi.

Al-Rishawi, whose father and three brothers were killed by al-Qaida assassins, said insurgents were "killing innocent people, anyone suspected of opposing them. They brought us nothing but destruction and we finally said, enough is enough."

Al-Rishawi founded the Anbar Salvation Council in September with dozens of Sunni tribes. Many of the new newly friendly leaders are believed to have at least tacitly supported the insurgency in the past, though al-Rishawi said he never did.

"I was always against these terrorists," al-Rishawi said in an interview inside his American-guarded compound, adjusting a pistol holstered around his waist. "They brainwashed people into thinking Americans were against them. They said foreigners wanted to occupy our land and destroy our mosques. They told us, 'We'll wage a jihad. We'll help you defeat them.'"

The difficult part was convincing others it wasn't true, and that "building an alliance with the Americans was the only solution," al-Rishawi said.

His movement, also known as the Anbar Awakening, now counts 41 tribes or sub-tribes from Anbar, though al-Rishawi acknowledges that some groups in the province have yet to join. It's unclear how many that is, or much support the movement really has.

And there is opposition. In November, a top Sunni leader who heads the Association of Muslim Scholars, Sheik Harith al-Dhari, described al-Rishawi's movement as "thieves and bandits." And for at least a year, U.S. forces have also witnessed sporadic firefights between Sunni militias and insurgents in Ramadi, reflecting the growing split among Sunnis. They used to describe such skirmishes as "red on red" fighting — battles between enemies. Now they call it "red on green."

But violence in some districts of Ramadi previously hit by daily street battles has dwindled to a degree so low that American soldiers can walk on the streets in some areas and hand out soccer balls without provoking a firefight — apparently a direct result of the sheik's influence.

U.S. Lt. Nathan Strickland, also of the 1-77th, said the sheiks were influenced by the realization that Shiite Iran's regional influence was rising, and "the presence of (Sunni) foreign fighters here was disrupting the traditional local tribal structure."

Al-Rishawi and other sheiks urged their tribesmen to join the police force, and 4,500 Sunnis heeded the call in Ramadi alone — a remarkable feat in a city that had almost no police a year ago.

Local Sunnis have deeply resented the overwhelmingly Shiite Iraqi army units the Shiite-dominated government in Baghdad has deployed here. Sunni tribes have begun to realize that if anybody is going to secure the city, it might as well be the sons of Ramadi, Strickland said.

Also pouring through the streets in police trucks fixed with heavy machine-guns are 2,500 Sunni tribesmen who have joined newly created SWAT team-like paramilitary units. Paid by the Interior Ministry with the blessing of U.S. commanders, the so-called Emergency Response Units are clearly loyal to local sheiks. Some wear track suits and face-covering red-checkered headscarves — looking startlingly like insurgent fighters. Others wear crisp green camouflage uniforms bought by al-Rishawi.

The ERU members were screened and sent either on 45-day police training courses in Jordan or seven-day courses at a military base in Ramadi — part of an effort to capitalize on the Awakening movement and make use of them as quickly as possible.

"I'd say 20 percent of the credit for the change in Ramadi could be taken by U.S. forces," said Strickland. "The vast majority of the turnaround is due to the sheiks."

Shiite Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki made his first trip to Anbar province this month, meeting al-Rishawi and saying he applauded Sunni tribes and clans that had "risen up and countered terrorism."

Still, al-Rishawi complained the Interior Ministry had given police and ERU units "one-tenth" of the resources they needed — from equipment to guns to food, despite promises to do more. Some of the fighters use automatic weapons they brought from home.

"If I had the tools, I could wipe al-Qaida from Anbar within five months," al-Rishawi said.

Strickland said the government was probably "hesitant to strengthen and supply something that might become a popular Sunni movement."

The message has taken longer to spread to eastern Ramadi, but it's getting through there, too, said Maj. Dave Christensen of the U.S. Army's 1st Battalion, 9th Infantry Regiment.

The base he works from used to be hit daily by mortar attacks, prompting outgoing barrages targeting launch sites that inadvertently damaged buildings, killed cattle, and alienated locals. The sheik responsible for the neighborhood where the attacks originated began cooperating with Americans a few months ago, prompting insurgents to attack and burn down his house.

"He fought back, then called and said, 'Hey, I've been helping you, now I could use your help,'" Christensen said.

U.S. forces moved into the now relatively quiet area, and Christensen's base has seen only a handful of mortar strikes since.

Saturday, March 24, 2007

The Beat Goes On

Just to update on a few prior posts...

In early February, in this post, I made the observation that of all groups who have an interest in seeing the US lose the war on terror, the Democrats (even moreso than al Qaeda) have the biggest stake.

Here's what I said back then:
Who has the most to lose if President Bush's revised strategy in Iraq (getting rid of Rumsfeld, the troop surge, etc.) improves the situation or even leads to an outright US victory (however that is determined)?

Al Qaeda? The Sunnis? The Shi'ites? Syria? Iran?

No, No, No, No and No.

The Democratic Party of the United States.

Yep.

They need the US to suffer defeat in Iraq before the election in 2008. If they have a US defeat to use as a weapon, they will likely defeat any Republican candidate.

Think about that as you watch Congress over the next few months.


Yesterday, the good folks at Powerline came to the same conclusion. Here's what they said:

That's right. I think it has become clear to pretty much everyone that the Democrats want defeat in Iraq in order to advance their political agenda. That is not a view that is shared by the American people. If President Bush stays firm, the Dems could be in trouble. Of course, everything depends, as always, on events on the ground.


Perhaps they are loyal Zhid readers?

And on another topic, even though the NY Times would have us believe that it's all puppies and rainbows between Hamas and Fatah, those animals (the Palestinians, not the NY Times) can't resist the urge to kill one another.

From today's Jerusalem Post...
Fatah family vows revenge on Hamas

Hundreds of Fatah supporters clamored for revenge against Hamas on Saturday, during the funeral of a Fatah loyalist killed in a new round of infighting that left four people dead since the Hamas-Fatah coalition government was formed a week ago.

The latest victim was Arafa Nofal, a pro-Fatah security man, whose bullet-riddled body was found outside the home of a Hamas-allied family late Friday, hours after he was kidnapped, security officials said.

Nofal's family carried his bruised body, wrapped in Fatah's yellow flag and a Palestinian flag, through the streets of Gaza City. "The response is coming, the response is coming," shouted the mourners, including dozens of gunmen.

The formation of the coalition government was to have put an end to a bloody Hamas-Fatah power struggle that killed more than 140 people in the past year. However, four people have been killed in Gaza since the new coalition was sworn in.

Among the dead was a 4-year-old boy caught in crossfire Thursday
.

On Thursday, a Gaza man was killed during a showdown between his Fatah-affiliated family and members of a Hamas militia, while on Wednesday a 24-year-old Fatah man was killed in an armed clash between Fatah and Hamas supporters.


I wonder whether this is front page news in the NY Times...or whether they have pictures of the 4 year old who was killed by his own people...

As I said in February,

They are proving, at this moment, that there is no need for a Palestinian Arab state.

Why should we believe that they would do anything different if they also had Judea and Samaria? They don't care about having their own state, they care about covering the landscape in blood and, as a byproduct, destroying Israel and Jews.

They've always said that ending the occupation was simply a step on the way to destroying Israel and they're showing us that they weren't kidding about that.

With all the money that is sent to them, they could be creating farms, factories and jobs (well, jobs that don't involve an explosion). They could prove to the world that they are good citizens and that even if they still have a beef with Israel, they are ready to be civilized and solve the problems that afflict their people.

Instead, they can't even last a day without going back to bloodshed.

I've met a lot of Palestinian Arabs and many of them are very bright people. There is no doubt that individually, Palestinian Arabs are capable of being productive citizens. There are scores of Palestinian Arab doctors, engineers, lawyers and businessmen. So why do they, when they are gathered together, seem capable of nothing but sowing violence?

I don't know.

What I do know is that history shows us that they, as a community, refuse to even attempt to be civilized and productive people.

Where are the Palestinian Arab kibbutzim and moshavim? Where are the Palestinian Arab tech companies?


And, most important, given the long history of Palestinian Arab terrorism, where is there any indication that we should trust them to give up violence?


At some point, the world is going to have to realize that the Zhid speaks the truth. The Palestinian Arabs are incapable of self governance and autonomy.

Saturday, March 17, 2007

Who are you calling "boy"?

So here’s the big Zhiddy post I promised….

A few months ago the Zhid wife went to a work related conference. At the end of the conference, as a form of entertainment for the poor people who had sat through two days of mind-numbing banking presentations, a National Geographic anthropologist made a presentation about the study he was doing.

The study happened to be the National Geographic Genographic project. Click on the link for more information, but what it does, in essence, is collect DNA samples from people around the world in an attempt to isolate certain parts of DNA that can be used to track a person's history through the world.

That's probably a terrible description of what the project does, so just go to the link. What is important, though, is that at the end of the presentation everyone was given a kit (free, to warm this Zhid's heart) that would allow the participant to submit a DNA sample and receive a report that shows where that participant's ancestors came from.

The Zhid wife knew that I was very interested in this type of thing and allowed me to participate in the study. That day I swabbed my Zhiddy cheek and sent off the sample for analysis.

The way the analysis works is that you send the sample with no identification other than an alphanumeric id that you use to check the results of the test. They have no idea who the participant is.

In other words, for all they knew, I was a black female from Alabama. It's a totally blind study.

Fast forward six or so weeks and the results are in.

As background, I was interested to see where my DNA says I came from not only for the obvious reason (i.e., it's interesting), but also because I would like to know whether there is anything in my DNA that would corroborate family history and my Jewish identity. That is, am I really a person descended from the Israelites of biblical times or am I someone whose family, somewhere over the centuries, picked up a religion and stuck with it.

Because of this angle, I requested that the analysis be done on my mother's side. The test is either/or-you can test either the Y chromosone or the X, but not both. Since in Judaism your lineage is tracked through the mother's side, that is the side I wanted tested.

And as further background, my grandmother (who lived to the age of 97 and was shockingly lucid right up to the end) was a woman of few words (probably because she came to the United States in the 40s, when she was in her 40s, speaking nothing but Czech and German and was always uncertain of her English skills, even though they were perfectly fine, though accented). She didn't regale us with stories of her past very much, but when she did she had a specific story to tell, one that was always consistent.

The story was that while her family last lived near Prague in Czechoslovakia, the family lore was as follows: before arriving in central Europe, part of her family had spent a number of years in Spain (the Zhid father believes that they were the Aguilar family, but I think he mistakes the book "The Family Aguilar", which is a story of Jews in Spain, for my grandmother's family in particular), being forced out in the late 1400s as a result of the inquisition. They arrived in Spain from Rhodes, where, according to my grandmother, her family had spent many centuries.
There is some historical support for this, as there was a Jewish community on Rhodes from as far back as around 300 BC. Nonetheless, prior to Rhodes, the family tracked itself back to the land of Israel and it ends there.

That was my grandmother's story and it was a story that she told many times over the years, but we never did much research into it.

So now comes the DNA results and all of a sudden my grandmother's words come back to life.

Before getting into the details of what I found, here is the map that shows my mother's family's journey, based on the DNA analysis.












The red line is my DNA's history. The premise, based on the DNA collected and other studies, is that all people originated somewhere in eastern Africa at the beginning of human existence. From there the various races developed as people migrated around the world and developed different characteristics. So everyone's map will start where the L1 line is. From there, things diverge based on the individual.

As I understand this, if you are an African tribesman, your DNA should show the L1 line and maybe L2 and L3, but assuming you are pure of race, that's about all it will show. Likewise, if you are, say, asian, it'll start with L1 and then your line wanders from Africa over into Asia. If you are of many races, you'd have multiple lines crisscrossing the map.

This is why I find my DNA map so interesting. I am on the N line, the N1B subtype in particular. My DNA was pure (which I understand is relatively rare) and shows a few things.

First, it shows that my grandmother's story is likely based in fact. While the N1 line branched off several times, some up through the Syria/Iraq and around the Black Sea into Europe, some east into Iran, one of the lines goes from the land of Israel into Turkey/Greece, which would corroborate the story of my grandmother's family spending a lot of time on Rhodes after leaving the biblical land of Israel.

And then a curious thing happens. The line stops.

I have one of the more compact DNA lines around, which means the following: After the time that the family landed in Rhodes, they stayed in very small communities with others of the same background and had no outside influence (i.e., my grandmother's ancestors didn't mess around with the goyim or even other Jews from different backgrounds). Since the history would indicate that the time on Rhodes was pre-Inquisition, what it likely means is that from before 1400 till my mother's generation, we were pure Jews, and if the story of the family being in Spain is true, there was no mixing with the Spanish population.

The next interesting thing has to do with the specific sub-category of my DNA (the N1B haplotype). Here's what the report said:

Your Branch on the Human Family Tree

Your DNA results identify you as belonging to a specific branch of the human family tree called haplogroup N1. Haplogroup N1 contains the following subgroups: N1*, N1a, N1b, N1c.

The map above shows the direction that your maternal ancestors took as they set out from their original homeland in East Africa. While humans did travel many different paths during a journey that took tens of thousands of years, the lines above represent the dominant trends in this migration.

Over time, the descendants of your ancestors spread throughout the Near East; your haplogroup constitutes one of the four founding Ashkenazi Jewish mitochondrial lineages. But before we can take you back in time and tell their stories, we must first understand how modern science makes this analysis possible.



What does this mean? The part in bold was the most interesting thing. The report told me that I am an Ashkenazi Jew. They had no idea who I was when I submitted the sample. Like I said, for all they knew, I was a black woman from the American south. That they not only told me that I'm a Jew but knew specifically what type I am was quite impressive.


Even more impressive is the level of specificity that they provided:

Haplogroup N1: A New Tribe Is Formed

Ancestral line: "Eve" > L1/L0 > L2 > L3 > N > N1

Your genetic lineage places you in one of the subgroups of N, known as N1. In addition to a wide geographic distribution similar to that of N, your haplogroup is significant because its members constitute one of the four major Ashkenazi Jewish founder lineages.

In addition to a wide geographic distribution similar to that of N, one particular branch of N1, namely N1b, is significant because one of its lineages constitute one of the four major Ashkenazi Jewish founding lineages. The N1b lineages representative of this Ashkenazi heritage are characterized by the mutations 16145A, 16176A, 16223T, 16390A, 16519C which can be confirmed using the data above.

The term "Ashkenazi" refers to Jews of mainly central and eastern European ancestry. Most historical records indicate that the founding of the Ashkenazi Jewry took place in the Rhine Basin and subsequently underwent vast population expansions. In more recent times, the Ashkenazi population was estimated at approximately 25,000 individuals around 1300 A.D., whereas that number had increased to about 8,500,000 individuals by the turn of the twentieth century.

Around half of all Ashkenazi Jews trace their mitochondrial lineage back to one of four women, and your haplogroup N1 represents one of those lineages. N1 is seldom found in populations of non-Ashkenazi Jews. While it is virtually absent in Europeans, it appears at frequencies of roughly three percent or higher in those from the Levant, Arabia, and Egypt. This indicates a strong genetic role in the Ashkenazi founder event, which likely occurred in the Near East.

Today, haplogroup N1 is the second most common in Ashkenazi Jews and today is shared by around 800,000 people.


They were able to isolate me to a group of 800,000 people on the planet. While this may not seem like a very specific result, when you consider that there are currently about 6.7 billion people on the planet, they were able to pinpoint me to .01% of the world's population. I consider that an incredible result.

More incredible is that they can trace my mother's side back to one of the four founding women of the Ashkenazi Jewish people and can further state that this line of DNA rarely exists outside of Ashkenazi Jews and when it does appear outside of Jews, it is almost never in Europeans (where my mother's side lived last, showing that there was no inbreeding with non-Jews) and those it does show up in are non-Jewish people of the area around biblical Israel, indicating that they likely were Jews who strayed from the faith but stayed in the greater Israel area.

I did some further study on the N1B lineage and found some very detailed genetic studies that show the source of the N1B line was the area of modern Israel.

And that's what was most gratifying to me. Not only do I now have solid DNA evidence of my Jewish lineage, I have evidence that is about as strong as it comes that my bloodline is directly tied to the land of Israel. Not a little bit of it, but a pure line, a direct connection between me and Israel.

Where I go with this is, of course, political. I often hear those who hate Israel, especially those in Arab countries, say that the Jews are interlopers in the land, that the Palestinian Arabs are the true inhabitants of Israel and the Jews are actually Europeans who have made an unsupportable claim on Arab lands.

If this is true, how can they explain the fact that my DNA traces directly and purely back to the people who lived in the land of Israel thousands of years ago? More damming for them, of course, is the fact that my people stayed pure over the centuries of the diaspora.

How can anyone say that I, and my fellow Jews, have no right to the land of Israel when our DNA clearly and directly puts us in that land?





Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Outsourcing Wasn't Such A Bad Idea After All! (and check back in a few days for the Zhidiest post of all time)

One of the memorable things from the 2004 presidential elections was John Kerry hammering away at President Bush with the idiotic slogan about outsourcing the hunt for bin Laden and allowing him to escape at Tora Bora. Kerry was (in his pathetic manner) trying to point out that several years after the 9/11 Islamic terror attacks on the United States, Bush still hadn't captured the guy responsible.

Well, guess what...turns out that bin Laden was a red herring. The actual operational head of the 9/11 attacks (as well as just about every other Islamic terror attack focused on the US, including the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center) was not bin Laden. It was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed.

You remember him...the guy who looked like John Belushi the morning after?



So will John Kerry now apologize to President Bush and congratulate him for having caught the mastermind of the 9/11 Islamic terror attacks within two years of the attacks and well before the 2004 Presidential elections?

Perhaps, if the left and their media handlers were to put politics aside, they'd realize that we really have made great strides in combating Islamic terror. Oh, wait...maybe they do realize that and are none to pleased...

In other subjects, I don't have time right now to pen the post properly, but I will be making some time in the next few days to write the mother of all Zhid posts. This one will not be about the Parker decision (G-D BLESS THE DC CIRCUIT); rather, it will be about a DNA test I took and the results that just came back.

There is interesting news in Zhidville, news that goes back generations and will conclusively resolve one major middle east issue. Check back in the next few days!